"Your skin was the emblem of your identity, the image that you presented to the world. But it was never who you really are. So you’re in the unique position to understand what most people never will; that skin is the clothing but not the essence of a person."

- Andrew Davidson; The Gargoyle (via musesofaninsomniac)
Source: musesofaninsomniac

thesetelevisionblues:

E. E. Cummings

thesetelevisionblues:

E. E. Cummings

(via coffeenonsense)

Source: Flickr / zoe52

fastcompany:

Interface and product design win again.

When selecting a partner to power mobile payments in its stores, Starbucks could have approached Google, one of the most profitable companies in the world. It could have worked with PayPal, which already has more than 106 million users in the payments space. Or Isis, a consortium formed by telecom giants Verizon, AT&T and T-Mobile that is also producing a “mobile wallet.”
“I’m sure if you and I were to rattle off the names of everyone in the space, that at some level we’ve been in discussions with them,” Starbucks’ Chief Digital Officer Adam Brotman tells Fast Company. Presumably that includes Mastercard, Visa, and Verifone, which handles $10 billion in global transactions per year. But Starbucks chose to partner with Square, a three-year-old startup. Why?
“They’re focused with a level of intensity on the customer experience,” Starbucks CEO Howard Shultz told a small group of reporters Wednesday morning.
In other words, Square treats payments a lot like Starbucks treats coffee: by focusing on the experience around a product that is more or less a commodity.

Why Did Starbucks Choose Square?

fastcompany:

Interface and product design win again.

When selecting a partner to power mobile payments in its stores, Starbucks could have approached Google, one of the most profitable companies in the world. It could have worked with PayPal, which already has more than 106 million users in the payments space. Or Isis, a consortium formed by telecom giants Verizon, AT&T and T-Mobile that is also producing a “mobile wallet.”

“I’m sure if you and I were to rattle off the names of everyone in the space, that at some level we’ve been in discussions with them,” Starbucks’ Chief Digital Officer Adam Brotman tells Fast Company. Presumably that includes Mastercard, Visa, and Verifone, which handles $10 billion in global transactions per year. But Starbucks chose to partner with Square, a three-year-old startup. Why?

“They’re focused with a level of intensity on the customer experience,” Starbucks CEO Howard Shultz told a small group of reporters Wednesday morning.

In other words, Square treats payments a lot like Starbucks treats coffee: by focusing on the experience around a product that is more or less a commodity.

Why Did Starbucks Choose Square?

Source: Fast Company

No need to rush.

No need to rush.

(via ilikeyourmind)

Source: over-there

From: Adfreak
Awesome way to keep your edgy and attract all the right kinds of attention. Innovative advertisement!

From: Adfreak

Awesome way to keep your edgy and attract all the right kinds of attention. Innovative advertisement!

How Recruiters Use Social Networks to Screen Candidates - Infographic

To Boost Creativity, Study Abroad

“…If you want to think outside the box, spend some time outside the country.”

mmarrazzo:

nevver:

The Home Office


This is awesome! I would seriously use this.

mmarrazzo:

nevver:

The Home Office

This is awesome! I would seriously use this.

Source: nevver

springwise:

Crowdfunding site helps donors back businesses in their neighborhood
There are now numerous crowdfunding platforms helping new and small businesses to find the capital they need, and we’ve seen hyper-local one-project-a-week efforts before in the shape of Lucky Ant. With a similar objective, Smallknot helps neighborhood enterprises to create their own funding projects, with reward packages for pledgers. READ MORE…

springwise:

Crowdfunding site helps donors back businesses in their neighborhood

There are now numerous crowdfunding platforms helping new and small businesses to find the capital they need, and we’ve seen hyper-local one-project-a-week efforts before in the shape of Lucky Ant. With a similar objective, Smallknot helps neighborhood enterprises to create their own funding projects, with reward packages for pledgers. READ MORE…

Source: springwise

We love this. As humans we deserve to be treated as more than consumers. Keep an eye out for an article about the harmful effects of advertising from the AvantGuard.
fastcompany:

See The Results Of “Brandalism,” The World’s Largest Act Of Ad Subversion
Combining the efforts of 25 artists from 8 countries, “Brandalism” is both art project and mission statement: the world’s first international “subvertising” collaboration
[Ironically, we are unable to turn off the interstitial ads in this slideshow!]

We love this. As humans we deserve to be treated as more than consumers. Keep an eye out for an article about the harmful effects of advertising from the AvantGuard.

fastcompany:

See The Results Of “Brandalism,” The World’s Largest Act Of Ad Subversion

Combining the efforts of 25 artists from 8 countries, “Brandalism” is both art project and mission statement: the world’s first international “subvertising” collaboration

[Ironically, we are unable to turn off the interstitial ads in this slideshow!]

Source: fastcocreate.com

"I think failing is the best way to keep you grounded, curious, and humble. Success is dangerous because often you don’t understand why you succeeded. You almost always know why you’ve failed. You have a lot of time to think about it."

- Mark Pincus (via justinraczak)
Source: justinraczak

yellofish:

inspire identity

yellofish:

inspire identity

Source: yellofish

Text

China

Interesting (and alarming) article by Gordon G. Chang on the contraction of the Chinese economy.

“Of the companies that I talk to throughout China, there isn’t a single one that is looking at an increase in revenues or an increase in profits this year.” - Patrick Chovanec of Tsinghua University in Beijing

Text

S&P Logo

Read the article here: AP: A year later, S&P downgrade of US looks like a dud

(via mmarrazzo)

Source: pavelnovel